AL-HUDA
Foundation, NJ U. S. A
MUHAMMAD IN THE CHRISTIAN CONTEXT
Concentrating on the commonalities between the Abrahamic Faiths
By Moin Ansari
A woman would throw garbage from the rooftop on the Prophet Muhammad every
day in Mecca. One day when he did not see any garbage, he went looking for her,
asked about her and found out that she was sick. He prayed for her and gave
her solace and comfort. He was so impressed, that she converted to Islam.
An older Christian woman Khatija hired the young Mohamed for trade. He
conducted her affairs so honestly that she asked him to marry her. He remained
faithful to her 'till her death. She was one of the first converts to Islam.
Muhammad was known as the honest one, before he became a prophet and even
afterwards, even by his worst pagan enemies.
These are the stories I grew up with. This is my image of my prophet. This is
the image all Muslims think of when we think of our prophet.
May God forgive me if I have transgressed and show me the right way.
I have tried to define Islam in Christian and non-religious terms. Michael
Baigent, Elaine Pagels, The Gnostic Bible and the Naag Hamdi texts not
withstanding, there is historical precedence in understand the message of Muhammad in
the Christian context. This commonality will help us understand the message and
therefore Islam and Muslims. UNDERSTANDING the genesis of the religion will
help us understand each other and this will help us gain understanding of world
events.
Once we have understood Muhammad in the Christian context, then it is much
easier to understand Jesus in the Muslim context. American Deists have already
done that in many ways
The hordes are not coming. They have always been here. There is nothing to
fear from Muslims who are like Unitarians or like Jefferson or Madison.
MUHAMMAD IN THE CHRISTIAN CONTEXT
Islam is “Hetrodox Christianity”...John Damascus
The status of Muhammad has to be understood in the context of Christian Dogma
and Christian beliefs of “inerrancy”, "infallibility" “inspiration” and the
liberal interpretation of the Gospels. The discussion of the status of Jesus
Christ has always been a topic of discussion between Christians. In many ways
the discussions of Jesus Christ and the theological differences between Islam
and Christianity are essentially a discussion about the so called heresies of
Arias and Eusebius of Caesarea that germinated in the city of Antioch. This
has been prolifically elucidated by Thomas Jefferson in his “Jeffersen Bible”.
Many churches have taken a liberal approach to the interpretation of the Bible
and consider is inspired or infallable.
Historically, Arianism was a majority opinion among Christians, but this
began to change when Emperor Constantine intervened on behalf of and Trinitarians.
The Council of Nicea in 325 headed by Emperor Constantine adopted the Nicean
concept of Trinity, Arias was exiled and his promulgation "anethmized".
However that was not the end Arianism. Arianism survived until 381AD in the Western
Roman Empire and then thrived in the Easter Roman empire and other areasuntill the 7th century. After that Arianism went underground. Evangelists sent to
the Germanic peoples converted the Goths to Arianism. When the Germanic people
entered the Roman empire they entered it as Arians and used this form of
Christianity to differentiate themselves from the Romans. The Germanic peoples were
Arians. Arianism did not die even then. The flag of Arianism laws carried by “
The Brethren of the Common Life”, who were a medieval lay group dedicated to
Bible study and education. They were persecuted, fled their native homelands
and were scattered all over Europe. They are by many account held responsible
for the renaissance. Martin Luther’s schooling included the Latin school at
Mansfeld, a year at a school in Magdeburg (run by the Brethren at Eisenach). In
his 15th year, Luther made valued older friends and was influenced by Arian
ideas. Luther’s ideas led to the Christian reformation. Here are some of the
positive things said by Martin Luther about Muhammad and Islam:
From this book, accordingly, we see that the religion of the Turks or Muham-
mad is far more splendid in ceremonies—and, I might almost say, in customs—
than ours, even including that of the religious or all the clerics. The modesty
and simplicity of their food, clothing, dwellings, and everything else, as well as the
fasts, prayers, and common gatherings of the people that this book reveals are nowhere
seen among us—or rather it is impossible for our people to be persuaded to them.
Furthermore, which of our monks, …Martin Luther
In 1532 facing the threat of the Turkish invasion, the Emperor agreed to a
truce with the Protestants in the Religious Peace of Nürnberg. Facing the
Turksih invasion Luthers’s ideas changed. Bernard Shaw also had a lot of good things
to say about Islam.
…the 'Bull' of Pope Innocent III causing the massacre of 20,000 men, women
and children (Albigenses) in France and the nailing of Martin Luther's 95
questions on the Church door in Germany, it stretches a long period in between. The
European society passed through a massive reform during this time. The reform
movement of Peter Waldo of France, John Wycliffe of England, Jan Hus of
Bohemia (Czech), Girolamo Savonarola of Italy, Michael Servetus of Spain, UlrichZwingli of Switzerland, William Tyndale of England and hundred others must have
influenced Bernard Shaw to lean heavily towards the fairness of early Islam -
the Islam that Prophet Muhammad once preached.
In addition to Suleriman, Charles was threatened by the pope, the king of
France, and even some of his own princes! Suleriman, in opposing Charles V,
helped the Protestants militarily and financially. God thus used the Moslem nation
to provide opportunity for the Reformation to grow in Germany and in the rest
of Europe.
Rumis influences: For Mevlana, a human being is made up of REASON (
knowledge, thought, conscience, maturity), LOVE ( emotions, poetry, music) and SPIRIT (
life, motion, whirling). It is very unlikely to find the three clamped to
each other in theory and meaning in such a way in any other system. As a result,
this approach created an ecolé, namely "Mevlana's Whirling Dervishes", and it
has had great influence on people for centuries. Desiderius Erasmus
Roterodamus, one of the humanists of Renaissance in 16th century, Martin Luther and
Sebastian Frank, who translated some of Mevlana's poems, Rambrandt(artist-17th
century), Beethoven (composer-18th century), Frederick Ruckert, Joseph von
Hammer, Johann Volfgang von Goethe(writers- 19th century) , Prof R. Nicholson and
Prof Arbery of Cambridge University(20th century) and Heins Meinke (poet), Prof
Helmuth Ritter and Anne Marie Schimmel of Bonn University (orientalists- 20th
century) are some who were influenced by Mevlana's philosophy.
ISLAM AS “HETRODOX CHRISTIANITY”: John of Damascus actually calls IslamHetrodox Christianity. John of Damascus is called the first apologetic of Islam
and a detractor. In his book the "Heresies of Ishamail" he pretty much defines
Islam in the light of Arianism and what he defines as Nestorianism. Nestorius
(c.386-c.451) was a pupil of Theodore of Mopsuestia in Antioch and later became
the Patriarch of Constantinople. He preached against the use of the title
Mother of God (Theotokos) for the Virgin Mary and would only call her Mother of
Christ (Christotokos).
John of Damascus in today's light would not be considered an apologetic of
Islam. I would consider him a proponent of Islam since he ties Islam to a kind
of a Gnostic Gospel.
Since the Quran and the teaching of the Quran are considered divine and
calling them divinely inspired, obviously is heresy in Islam since it reduces the
prophet and Quran to external influences. However it is fascinating to see the
link between Islam and Christianity. If we read Arianism and Nestorianism, and
Unitarianism in conjunction with what the Archbishop of Canterbury says, it
paints a picture of immense interaction between Islam and a much closer
relationship than generally accepted.
Fletcher in his book “The Cross and the Crescent” lists a lot of
commonalities between Islam and Christianity and informs us the Syriac Christian Churches
felt liberated when the Muslim took over the Holy lands. In all Muslims lands
taken over by Muslims from Christians, the number of churches built went up
phenomenally. The Syriac and Coptic Christians were closer to "Unitarians" and
the heterodox Christian doctrine of Nestorianism. From a Christian perspective
These were all the "heresies" that eventually got purged by Emperor
Constantine and got included into Islam
MUHAMMAD THE REFORMER: Muhammad was a reformer in a sea of paganism. His
message was the purest form of monotheism that exists in the three Abrahamic
religions. He had married a Christian woman by the name of Khadija. When Muhammad
got his message from God he was referred to Khadija’s unlce Waqaba who was a
Monophysite Christian. Waqaba informed Muhammad that the voices he was hearing
was from God and there is prophecy in the Bible about someone like Muhammad.
With the Arian Goths in decline, the land was hungry for the purest form of
monotheism. He was taking Arabia and the world back to monotheism. He pointed
out the excesses of the synagogue just like Jesus had done 600 years earlier.
Muhammad also tried to reform the established church just like Martin Luther
did a thousand years later. Muhammad was extremely successful because the pagans
and the progeny of Arians accepted the new monotheist message. Islam spread
like wildfire.
Quran [5:82] ..And you will find that the closest people in friendship to the believers are
those who say, "We are Christian." This is because they have priests and monks among
them, and they are not arrogant.
[7:159] Among the followers of Moses there are those who guide in accordance with
the truth, and the truth renders them righteous.
[5:46] Subsequent to them, we sent Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming the
previous scripture, the Torah. We gave him the Gospel, containing guidance and
light, and confirming the previous scriptures, the Torah, and augmenting its
guidance and light, and to enlighten the righteous.
[5:47] The people of the Gospel shall rule in accordance with GOD's
revelations therein. Those who do not rule in accordance with GOD's revelations are
the wicked.
[2:62 & 5:69] Surely, those who believe, those who are Jewish, the
Christians, and the converts; anyone who (1) believes in GOD, and (2) believes in the
Last Day, and (3) leads a righteous life, will receive their recompense from
their Lord. They have nothing to fear, nor will they grieve.
CHRISTIANITY AT THE TIME OF MUHAMMAD: The "Christianity" and "Judaism"that existed at the time of Muhamamad was pre-reform Catholicism and Pre-Orthodox
type of Judaism. It was very different than the Christianity and Judaism that
exists today. The Christianity was probably based on the he scriptures called
Diatesseron and the Catholic Epistles or Peshitta. Since the Qur'ân talks about
a Gospel, it would suggest Diatesseron more than Peshitta. Muslims consider
the Quran to the 3rd and Final Testament and also think of the Torah and the
Bible as Holy Books. The Quran is the word of God. The Hadith is the sayings of
the prophet, so the Hadith is similar to the Bible. Christian Arab Kingdoms of
the Ghassanids and Muntherits became the powers controlling the Arab Peninsula
from Syria as far south as Yemen and Oman, and from Iraq as far south as the
Arab Sea. The other Christians near Muhammad were the Nabatians. The Nabateans
were settled in northern Arabia and by the 6th century BC, they moved to what
is now Jordan where they formed their state and kingdom. Petra, their
capital, was a trading center between Arabia and the Mediterranean Sea.
ARIANISM IN MODERN TIMES: Today Arianism survives in the works of John Locke,Isaac Newton, Milton Ben Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson.
Archbishop Dmitri of the Orthodox Church in America has identified Islam as
the largest descendant of Arianism today. There is similarity in Islam's
teaching that Jesus was a great prophet, but very distinct from God, although Islam
sees Jesus as a human messenger of God without the divine properties that
Arianism attributes to the Christ. Islam sees itself as a continuation of the
Jewish and Christian traditions and reveres many of the same prophets.
Nontrinitarians claim the roots of their position go back further than those
of their counterpart trinitarians. Some ancient sects, such as the Ebionites,
said that Jesus was not a "Son of God" but rather an ordinary man who was a
prophet, a view of Jesus shared by Islam. The doctrine of the Godhead, as
mentioned by Jefferson according to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,
is similar to Arianism
Thomas Jeffersen was in touch with John Locke and heavily influenced by John
Locke. In fact when Thomas Jeffersen wrote the “Jeffersen Bible” he mentions
that he has been in touch with all major philosophers of religion in Europe.
In 1700 Locke resigned from the Board of Trade and devoteri himself to Biblical
studies and religious meditation. He had carefully studied the Gospels in
preparing his “Reasonableness of Christianity.” In researching the Epistles of
St Paul, he applied the spirit of the Essay and the ordinary rules of critical
interpretation to a literature which he venerated as infallible. The work was
published two years after. A tract on Miracles, written in 1702, also
appeared posthumously. John Locke’s “The Reasonableness of Christianity” is
described by Samuel Bold.
Subscription controversy—the doctrinal dispute aroused by the spread of
Arianism. Under the commonwealth, Socinianism (represented by Paul Best and John
Biddle), Sabellianism (by John Fry), Arianism (by John Knowles, Thomas Collier
and Paul Hobson) and universalism (by Richard Coppin, John Reeve and Ludowicke
Muggleton), had been alike banned and persecuted. The intolerant attitude of
both presbyterians and independents was continued after the restoration; and to
this was now added the rigour of the re-established English church. To
Richard Baxter, not less than to John Owen or to Stillingfleet, the Socinians were
on a par with Mohammedans, Turks, atheists and papists. But, in spite of
persecution, the discrete strands of varying anti-Trinitarian thought remained
unbroken. Gilbert Clerke of Northamptonshire, a mathematician and, in a sense, a
teacher of Whiston, Noval of Tydd St. Giles near Wisbech, Thomas Firmin
(Sabellian), William Penn, Stephen Nye (Sabellian), William Freke (Arian), John Smith,
the philomath, of St. Augustine’s, London (Socinian), Henry Hedworth, the
disciple of Biddle, and William Manning, minister of Peasenhall (1630–1711)
(independent), form a direct and unbroken, though irregular, chain of
anti-Trinitarian thought, extending from the commonwealth days to those of toleration
not to mention the more covert but still demonstrable anti-Trinitarianism of Milton
and Locke.
With the passing of the Toleration act of 1689, the leaven of this long train
of anti-Trinitarian thought made itself strongly felt. It first appeared in the bosom of the
church of England itself, in the so-called Socinian controversy. In 1690, Arthur Bury,
a latitudinarian divine, was deprived of the rector ship of Lincoln college, Oxford, for
publishing his Naked Gospel. The proceedings gave rise to a stream of pamphlet
literature on both sides. In the same year, 1690, John Wallis, Savilian professor of
mathematics at Oxford, was involved in a controversy with a succession of
…anonymous Arian and Socinian writers (among them William Jones) by the
publication of his Doctrine of the Blessed Trinity briefly Explained.
Simultaneously, Sherlock’s Vindication of the Holy and ever Blessed Trinity, although
directed against the same group of writers, called forth another outburst of
pamphleteering from quite another quarter, South leading the attack with his
Animadversions upon Dr. Sherlock’s Vindication. The first portion of the
anti-Trinitarian literature produced in this triangular contest is collected in The Faith
of one God Who is only the Father (1691). In the ranks of dissent, the same
controversy manifested itself in the disputes which wrecked the independent and
presbyterian “happy union” and, contemporaneously, it appeared in the baptist
body. In 1693, Matthew Caffyn, baptist minister at Horsham, Sussex, was for a
second time accused before the “Baptist General Assembly” of denying Christ’
s divinity; and, when the assembly refused to vote his expulsion, a secession
took place, and the rival “Baptist General Association” was formed. In the
same year, the anti-Trinitarians published a Second collection of tracts proving
the God, and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the only true God (1693). The
tenth, and last, tract in this volume was a reply to South’s Animadversions on
Sherlock’s Vindication. In the following year (1694), the presbyterian John
Howe entered the field with his Calm and sober Inquiry directed against the
above tract, and, to make the fight triangular, Sherlock replied to South and Howe
together in A Defense of Dr. Sherlock’s notion of a Trinity in Unity. The
anti-Trinitarians’ Third collection of Tracts, which followed immediately, was a
reply at once to Howe, on the one hand, and to Sherlock, on the other.
This first Trinitarian or so-called Socinian controversy, practically, came
to an end in 1708. It received its deathblow, in 1698, by the act for the more
effectual suppression of blasphemy and profaneness, which remained on the
statute book till 1813. With the exception of John Smith’s Designed End to the
Socinian Controversy (1695), the whole of the anti-Trinitarian contributions to
it had been anonymous (both Locke and Sir Isaac Newton are supposed to have
contributed under the cover of this anonymity); and, with the exception of Howe,
no representatives of the professed dissenting denominations had joined in the
fray. It is therefore to be regarded, primarily, as a church of England
controversy, in which the churchmen had weakened the Trinitarian cause by a
triangular and virtually conflicting defence: Sherlock versus South versus Tillotson
and Burnet, and all four versus the enemy. The agitation which the controversy
produced among the dissenters was mainly reflex, and is apparent more in
their domestic quarrels, noted above, than in their published literature. But,
disproportionately small as was the dissenting share of the combatants in mere
point of literature, the intellectual ferment which ensued in following years
showed itself more in the bosom of dissent than in the life and thought of the
church of England. Thomas Emlyn, a presbyterian, who was tried at Dublin, in
1693, for publishing his Humble Inquiry into the Scripture account of Jesus
Christ, attributed his own Arianism to Sherlock’s Vindication of the Doctrine of
the Trinity.
MY MUHAMMAD: We can either demonize the OTHER religion or work on commonground. As Westernized Muslims, we can and should discuss the infallibilities of
Muhammad the man. He was a man and not a God. My research of his entire life
shows me a MAN OF COMPASSION, INCLUSIVELY and MAGNANIMITY. This opinion
is based on his entire life and teachings. I have so many stories that it would take
volumes of paper to print. This image of Muhammad is also my core belief and my
PERSONAL relationship with Muhammad the MAN. Muhammad's life spans many
decades. The religion was not based around his personality, but around the prophets
of the Bible. He even called it "Deen e Ibrahimi" or the religion of Abraham.
A cult would have died out in a year or so. It has now been 1400 years and
the religion is growing. There must be something in the religion and the message.
Muhammad and Islam have faced defamation from the first day the declaration
of the "shahadah" (submission to the will of God) was made. Muhammad's entire
life has been defined by many authors. The definitive works on the life of the
prophet were written centuries ago and new ideas are but summaries of the
books:
1) Ibn Ishaq wrote SIRAT RESUL ALLAH and
2) IBM Kahtir wrote AL- SERA AL- SIRA NABAWIYYA
A new PBS documentary on Muhammad created by Alexander Kronemer who regularly
writes on the interfaith site belief.com came out a couple of years ago. It
should be available in the library and on PBS. Is based upon Karen's book.
Karen Armstrong and Martin Lings are a few of the current authors that talk about
Muhammad. I read Karen's book ten years ago when it first came out. She
thinks of it as a gift to Muslims. I need to contact her about Banyu Quaraza and
the latest research
REJECTING DOGMA IN THE SPIRIT OF ECUMENICAL HARMONY: .Dogma creates problems. If we move away from dogma we find the power of
ecumenical harmony. Based on my research on the Church's adherence to "infallibility"
and "inerrancy", we can surely find common ground in our beliefs. Our belief is similar to
the
Christian belief as researched by Pagels and discussed in the Da Vinci Code (Naag
Hamdi Texts and the Lost Gnostic Bibles). In the broad spectrum of today's
Christianity, Islam is closest to the Unitarians, the flag bearers of Arianism.
We are also close to the Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and other liberal
churches who are willing to work with Muslims. The Pope has declared that Islam is
an Abrahamic faith and that belief in Islam qualifies a soul to enter heaven, a
thought described by Moses Maimonides in his Epistle to the Yemenites in the
12th century.
There is a book that is a must read for all Da Vinci Code fans, and those who
are interested in real history. Michael Baegent of "Holy Blood and Holy
Grail" fame, in his latest fact based historical book "The Jesus Papers", traces
the roots of the violent Jewish (Sakari, Pharisee, and Zedoc) insurgency against
the Romans and links the insurgency to Judas (Mathew 2:22, 2:23), and also to
Jesus Christ. Schoenfeld's "Passover plot" also discusses this insurgency
against the Roman occupiers of Judea (later reamed Palestina) and how the Jewish
Sakari used to use their daggers for assassinations. An overwhelming body of
evidence ties Jesus to the insurgency in Judea, and this may have been the main
reason to put him to death. The Roman backlash ended up with the Jews fleeing
to Masaada and them committing mass suicide.
As a result of the Jewish insurgency, in and around 70 AD, Jewish Jerusalem
was totally destroyed by the Romans and renamed Aelia de Capitolina. It was the
Romans that would display the bodies of their enemies along Roman roads.
Titus used Jews for entertainment.After the destruction of the 2nd temple around
70 AD, the despised Roman emperor, Herrod killed thousands of Jews and
displayed their bodies for everyone to see. The reverberations of this type of morbid
activity live to this day.
The conflict between the Jews and Romans has left its mark on history and
some of our Middle Eastern problems still ooze of those historical events. Around
130 AD, the Jewish zealot leader and Jewish insurgent leader Shimon bin
Cockba was captured by the Romans. His body was displayed as a trophy. The Roman
emperor Hedrian, after destroying Judea, renamed it Palestina. The creativity of
the jailers were used to try every human trick in the book to try to get
useless and insignificant information about the zealot movement out of poor and
innocent Jews. Titus used his Jewish prisoners for routine torture and perverse
tactics, like throwing live Jews in front of animals.
Martin Luther, the Protestant reformation and the Jewish reformation came
centuries later, and achieved the same type of reformation in destroying the
unyielding/tyrannical power of the Pope/Rabbi/Vatican. The Luther reformation was
aimed at those who remained with the Church.
FOUNDING FATHERS OF THE USA
Sir Isaac Newton, Jefferson, Adam, Franklin and others used these Unitarian
ideas and are today called "Deists". The founding fathers of America were
Deists whose ideas very similar to those expounded by the Arians, Unitarians and
Islam. John Locke (influenced by Ibn Tufail), James Madison and Benjamin
Franklin (friends of the most famous Unitarian Joseph Priestly), Thomas Jefferson
(who also owned a coy of the Quran), Isaac Newton (who wrote extensively in
defense of "Arianism" "A Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of
Scripture"), Milton were all Unitarians in some form or another. These Deists had ideas
about Jesus which were FAR from the dogma and their ideas were very close to
those that we have in the Islamic faith. Jefferson actually wrote a Bible free
of "dogma".
The USA is truly a conglomeration of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, and
those expounding a clash of civilizations are simply hate mongers. John Adams,
Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin were too enlightened to be bogged down in
dogma. They gave u our glorious constitution, and Jefferson even gave us a
Bible. Using these documents there is a lot of hope ecumenical harmony in the USA
which will surely reverberate back to South Asia and the Middle East.
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon) said: "On the Day of Resurrection I
will intercede and say, 'O my Lord! Admit into Paradise (even) those who
have faith equal to a mustard seed in their hearts.'" Sahih Al-Bukhari,
Volume 9, Hadith 600
REFERENCES:
The Reasonableness of Christianity as delivered in the Scriptures. 1695.
French trans. 1740; Dutch trans. 1729; German trans. 1733.
A Vindication of The Reasonableness of Christianity, … from Mr. Edwards’s
Reflections. 1695.
A Second Vindication of the Reasonableness of Christianity. 1697.
A Letter to the Right Reverend Edward Ld. Bishop of Worcester, concerning
Some Passages relating to Mr. Locke’s Essay of Humane Understanding: in a late
Discourse of his Lordship’s in Vindication of the Trinity. 1697.
Mr. Locke’s Reply to the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Worcester’s
Answer to his Letter. 1697.
Mr. Locke’s Reply to the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Worcester’s
Answer to his Second Letter. 1699.
A Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistle of St. Paul to the Galatians, etc. 1705.
Posthumous Works. 1706.
.
Best Regards,
Moin Ansari
All material published by Al-Huda.com / And the Message Continues is the sole responsibility of its author's).
The opinions and/or assertions contained therein do not necessarily reflect the editorial views of this site,
nor of Al-Huda and its officers.