Al-Huda
Foundation, NJ U. S. A
the Message Continues ... 8/156
HOME - NEWSLETTERS - BOOKS - ARTICLES
Article 1 - Article 2 - Article 3 - Article 4 - Article 5 - Article 6 - Article 7 - Article 8 - Article 9 - Article 10 - Article 11 - Article 12
WHAT NON-MUSLIMS SAY ABOUT THE HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.S.)
Some of the
European writers
in the past have
used the word “Muhamadanism”
while referring
to Islam, which
communicates the
idea of
worshiping
Muhammad (s.a.w.s.)
which is
absolutely
baseless. Islam
preaches
worshiping of
one god which is
Allah (s.w.t.)
and Muhammad (s.a.w.s.)
His servant and
Messenger.
A French
author, Alphonse
de LaMartaine,
had written in
his book,
Historie de la
Turquie,
published in
1854 in Paris
about the Holy
Prophet (s.a.w.s.):
“If greatness of
purpose,
smallness of
means, and the
astonishing
results are the
three criteria
of human genius,
who dare compare
any man in
history with
Muhammad (s.a.w.s.)?
The most famous
men created
arms, laws and
empires only.
They founded no
more than
material powers
which often
crumbled away.
This man not
only moved
armies,
legislations,
empires,
peoples,
dynasties, but
millions of men
in one-third of
the then
inhabited world;
and more than
that, he moved
the altars, the
gods, the
religions, the
ideas , the
beliefs, and the
souls.
Philosopher,
Orator, Apostle,
Legislator,
Conqueror of
Ideas, Restorer
of Rational
Beliefs, .The
Founder of
twenty
terrestrial
empires, and one
spiritual empire
that is Muhammad
(s.a.w.s.). As
regards all
standards by
which human
greatness may be
measured, we may
well ask, is
there any man
greater than he?
Sir George
Bernard Shaw
says in “The
Genuine Islam”:
“If any religion
has any chance
of ruling over
England, nay
Europe within
the next hundred
years, it is
Islam.” “I
have always held
religion of
Muhammad in high
estimation
because of its
wonderful
vitality. It is
the only
religion which
appears to me to
possess that
assimilating
capacity to the
changing phase
of existence
which can make
itself to appeal
every age. I
have studied him
– the wonderful
man in my
opinion for from
being an
anti-Christ, he
must be called The
Savior of
Humanity!”
“I believe
that a man like
him were to
assume the
dictatorship of
the modern world
succeed in
solving its
problems in a
way that it
would bring it
the much
needed peace and
happiness. I
have prophesied
about the faith
of Muhammad (s.a.w.s.)
that it would be
acceptable to
Europe of
tomorrow as it
is beginning to
be acceptable to
the Europe of
today.”
Mahatma
Gandhi said in
“Young India”:
“I wanted to
know the best of
the life of one
who holds today
the undisputed
sway over the
hearts of the
millions of
mankind. I
became more than
ever convinced
that it was not
the sword that
won a place for
Islam in those
days in the
scheme of life.
It was the rigid
simplicity, the
utter
self-effacement
of the Prophet
the scrupulous
regard for
pledges, his
intense devotion
for his friends
and followers,
his intrepidity,
his
fearlessness,
his absolute
trust in God,
and in his own
mission. These
and not the
sword carried
everything
before them and
surmounted every
obstacle.”
Michael
Hart’s famous
book; “The 100,
A Ranking of the
Most Influential
Persons in
History” New
York 1978 Mr.
Hart had
placed the Holy
Prophet (s.a.w.s.)
as the
first leading
person in
history. He
says: “My choice
of Muhammad to
lead the list of
the world’s most
influential
persons may
surprise some
readers and may
be questioned by
others, but
he was
the only man in
history who was
supremely
successful on
both the secular
and religious
levels. It
is probable the
relative
influence of
Muhammad (s.a.w.s.)
on Islam has
been larger than
the combined
influence of
Jesus Christ and
St. Paul on
Christianity. It
is this
unparalleled
combination of
secular and
religious
influence which
I feel entitles
Muhammad (s.a.w.s.)
to be considered
the most
influential
single
individual in
human history.”
Dr. William
Draper in
“History of
Intellectual
Development of
Europe”
writes: “Four
years after the
death of
Justinian A.D.
569, was born in
Mecca, in
Arabia, the man
who, of all men,
has exercised
the greatest
influence upon
the human race.
To be the
religious head
of many empires,
to guide the
daily life of
one-third of
human race, may
perhaps justify
the title of a
Messenger of
God.”
Thomas
Carlyle in
“Heroes and Hero
Worship and the
Heroic History”
1840 A.D.
writes “The Lies
(Western
Slander) which
well meaning
zeal has heaped
round this man
(Muhammad
s.a.w.s.) are
disgraceful to
ourselves only.
A silent great
soul, one of
that which
cannot but be
earnest. He was
to kindle the
world; the
worlds’ Maker
had ordered so.
Gibbon in
“The Decline and
Fall of Roman
Empire” 1823
Writes: “The
good sense of
Muhammad
despised the
pomp of royalty.
The Apostle of
God submitted to
the menial
offices of the
family; he
kindled the
fire, swept the
floor, milked
the ewes; and
mended with his
own hands his
shoes and
garments.
Disdaining the
penance and
merit of a
hermit, he
observed without
effort of vanity
the abstemious
diet of an
Arab.”
Phillip K.
Hitti in History
of the Arabs:
says:
“Within a brief
span of mortal
life, Muhammad (s.a.w.s.)
called forth of
unpromising
material, a
nation, never
welded before;
in a country
that was
hitherto a
geographical
expression he
established a
religion which
in vast areas
suppressed
Christianity and
Judaism, and
laid the basis
of an empire
that was soon to
embrace within
its far flung
boundaries the
fairest
provinces the
then civilized
world.”
D.G.Hogarth
in “Arabia”:
says: “Serious
or trivial, his
daily behavior
has instituted
canon which
millions observe
this day with
conscious
memory. No one
regarded by any
section of human
race as Perfect
Man has ever
been imitated so
minutely. The
conduct of the
founder of
Christianity has
not governed the
ordinary life of
his followers.
Moreover, no
founder of a
religion has
left on so
solitary an
eminence as the
Muslim Apostle.
Washington
Irving “Mahomet
and his
successors”:
says: “He was
sober and
abstemious in
his diet and a
rigorous
observer of
fasts. He
indulged in no
magnificence of
apparel, the
ostentation of a
petty mind;
neither was his
simplicity in
dress affected
but a real but a
result of a real
disregard for
distinction from
so trivial a
source.
In his private
dealings he was
just. He treated
friends and
strangers, the
rich and poor,
the powerful and
weak, with
equity, and was
beloved by the
common people
for the
affability with
which he
received them,
and listened to
their
complaints.
His military
triumph awakened
no pride nor
vain glory, as
they would have
done for had
they been
effected for
self purposes
.In the times of
his greatest
power he
maintained the
same simplicity
of manners and
appearance as in
the days of his
adversity. So
far from
affecting a
regal state, he
was displeased
if, on entering
a room, any
unusual
testimonial of
respect was
shown to him. If
he aimed at a
universal
dominion, it was
the dominion of
faith; as to the
temporal rule
which grew up in
his hands, as he
used without
ostentation, so
he took no step
to perpetuate it
in his family.”
Sources used:
The 100, A
Ranking of the
Most Influential
Persons in
History by
Michael Hart
Quotations from
famous people by
Dr. A. Zahoor &
Dr. Z.Haq
|
DISCLAIMER:
All material published by Al-Huda.com / And the Message Continues is the sole responsibility of its author's).
The opinions and/or assertions contained therein do not necessarily reflect the editorial views of this site,
nor of Al-Huda and its officers.